10
Colonial Office of the history of this Mui-tsai
problem and of the firmness of the Secretary of
State's policy in the matter.
(There is a private letter from Sir C.
Clementi and a despatch from the Governor, giving
an account of the steps taken to carry out the
Secretary of State's instructions in 627581/1929.
Ordinance No. 22 of 1929 requires to be sanctioned.
In 62933/1929 the new Protection of Women
and Girls Amendment Ordinance, which has some
connection with the Mui-tsai question also requir es
to be sanctioned subject to any legal observati ons)
Ido not
vier.
austing
GEthent.
with Mr. Sent 1
When
5/2/30
the convisin of
mui toi into draustir
adopte & davyttres could
solvents on adopted da
quite office to pultisepin in
I
I think 't it must te an attention I not a substitute for reprotectin as mui ti beaute a schild under
theage of 10 cant be admestic
and brvent,
ent, and
not anyone would is nothing tommele Ubernadoftied Many thers. When the men tri
to the Puritily pre
was brought by
by the complage
Chisvers Affairs
her
te le turned Kimbra domestic verant
rate
the acts of ways tile fait
couted of where le réserted.
Ishch. belt, the 0.46. that uses from
of his fronding
m
theonlines
Walter R Ellis
672
do not doubt that me. Ellis is right
Page 10Page 11
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.